• 2005 Judd’s Hill Cabernet Sauvignon – USA, California, Napa Valley (1/28/2010)
  Fleshy raspberry with a full, rich mouthfeel. Currant, tea leaf, and a touch of green herb that I love in many 2005 Napa Cabs. Tannins are fine and not off-putting but a few more years in the cellar will pay off for this wine. Not a 91 just yet, but I think it will be in time. A friend brought this to a restaurant but I see that it retails for somewhere just above $40. That’s a heck-of-a-deal for an excellent Napa Cab. (91 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

• 2007 Matua Valley Sauvignon Blanc Hawkes Bay – New Zealand, North Island, Hawkes Bay (1/28/2010)
  Crisp lemon zest, lychee fruit, pleasant level of grassiness. Hint of sweetness. Winner at $6 btg. (86 pts.)
• 2006 Boutari Santorini – Greece, Aegean, Santorini (1/28/2010)
  Light and refreshing with predominate melon and honey notes. $35 from a rather expensive restaurant list. I don’t know what this retails for but I’d say it’s worth $10 – $12. (84 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

On Wednesday, January 27, we will help Wineberserkers.com celebrate its one year anniversary. Wineberserkers is a fun, friendly, irreverent, highly informative, online community of folks who share a passion for wine. It also has one of the highest numbers of wine industry folks participating. They all, like us, are donating prizes and helping make the 27th a special day for this community of almost 2000 folks who have gone berserk over wine.

What is Match Vineyards doing? We are raffling off six magnums of the soon-to-be-released 2007 Butterdragon Hill. To enter this raffle you must be a registered member of WineBerserkers.com AND have made verifiable donation(s) totaling at least $135 (the retail value of the wine) to a charity or charities doing work in earth quake ravaged Haiti. This donation needs to have been made from 1/12/10 through 1/27/10. You also, of course, have to be at least 21 years of age. Complete details of how to enter will be on Wineberserkers.com.

So come on by WineBerserkers right now and join in the community. And on the 27th, it can really pay off.

Fo Drizzle. Well, I thought it was funny. Thanks to my son for that one. It’s quite appropriate given Northern California weather this week.
And continuing the totally useless, non-wine-related theme of this blog entry…
I stumbled upon this interesting site: One Sentence – True stories, told in one sentence.

1997 E. Pira & Figli (Chiara Boschis) Barolo Cannubi – Italy, Piedmont, Langhe, Barolo (1/16/2010)
Burnt cherry pie, baked dark berries, road tar, green herb. Tannins are pronounced but not debilitating. I liked this slightly unpolished, roguish barolo. Middle and finish are shallow but I expect this wine will flesh out more in 2-3 years and gain a few points beyond an 88+. (88 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

After a recent evening exhibition at the SFMOMA, Sasha and I found ourselves in need of a bite and where better to meet such a need than a place called “Fang.” We’d never heard of this slightly upscale Chinese restaurant but the hip decor and house full of San Francisco Gen X & Y-ers showed promise. It was a good choice.
Our waitress was obviously new and had little familiarity with the menu and sake choices. However, she promised that the chef would be by our table soon. Before we could stop her from summoning the chef, he appeared and indicated that he was here to cook whatever we wanted. (We later figured out that he did this at most, if not all, of the tables.) We were trying to steer clear of oily or heavy sauces and he recommended a white fish with spinach. We added some bok choy and tofu to the mix as well. This turned out to be a delicious variation on one of their menu items. We both thought the fish was fantastic. Sash thought it, and most everything, could have gone a little lighter on the salt. I saw her point: I like salty stuff and even I noticed the salt here. Giving in to that sodium siren though, I ordered a rather pleasing salty and spicey prawns on purpose. We shared an appetizers of steamed duck rolls. They were tasty, but not special.
In fact, “tasty but not special” sort of sums up our whole experience at Fang. I would walk several blocks to go to Fang. If in SOMA and hungry for Chinese food, I would go to Fang if parking wasn’t too much of a problem. But I don’t think I would drive across the Bay Bridge or even across SF to go to Fang.
The wine list is non-starter. Don’t even bother. There’s a small selection of sake, beers, and cocktails.
Fang’s owner also owns the Chinatown mainstay, House of Nanking.
Fang Restaurant
660 Howard Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 777-8568‎

2009 Familia Zuccardi Torrontés Santa Julia Organica – Argentina, Mendoza (1/14/2010)
Light color. Rich fruity aromas promise a bit more than this wine can deliver. Pear flavor is dominate with some melon notes as well. Nice full initial flavor but trails off quickly. Still, a pleasant wine and fully worthy if you’re looking for a light-bodied white wine that retailed here for just $8.99. (82 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

Well, at least the coming back home is. James Suckling, Bureau Chief of Wine Spectator Magazine and Editor for Cigar Aficionado Magazine, shares on his blog what happens when you try to return having forgotten a couple of Cubans and wine in the car. Read the very interesting — and a bit harrowing — story.
They’re serious about those customs laws.

• Difficulty sleeping?
• Difficulty concentrating?
• Obsessive compulsive behavior?
• Irritability?
• Mood swings?

If so, you may be, as I am, a wine collector during wine release season.
Every year my fellow sufferers and I make our wine-related New Year’s resolutions. “I’ll buy less wine in 2010.” “I’ll buy more wine in 2010.” “I’m going for quality over quantity.” “I need to concentrate more on daily drinkers.” “I’m going to collect a wider variety of wines.” “I’m going heavy on the 2007 vintage from Swavobia.” Whatever. By this time, if you’re still reading, you are either nodding your head in understanding, or shaking your head thinking I’m crazy.
If you are disciplined and able to easily follow your wine resolutions, well, my hat’s off to you.
This year I planned to continue last year’s trend of buying fewer bottles, spending less money on wine, and buying wines that are a better value. Notice that those last two are not necessarily the same thing. I’ve pretty much stopped chasing points — a bad habit new wine collectors can get in to — and am buying what I either know I like, what I suspect I will like, or wines recommended to me by trusted sources. That has ruled out many new wineries. Just because Mr Superstar Winemaker makes it or Mr Superstar Winereviewer says it is good will not make me pull the trigger on something, especially as the price starts approaching and then surpassing the century mark. And unfortunately, a lot of new wineries, especially those from my own beloved Napa, have surpassed $100… by a lot.
But I’ve got to admit I’ve got a collector’s (or hoarder’s) mentality and the potential loss of a coveted mailing list position does still strike “fear” into my heart every time I shred one of these new offers. Will I be sorry later?
Note to self: you are almost never sorry later with the exception of passing on Kosta Browne back in the very beginning.
The other day, I received a snail mail and email that the order window for a great winery was going to open. I’ve bought for quite a few years so had a large allocation initially including even the chance at a magnum. But now, the price that was about $60 per 750ml just a few years back, has risen to $125. For most of you, that is waaaaay too much to spend on a bottle of wine. It’s more than I should spend as well, but that didn’t make the decision any easier. This wine has garnered lofty scores from the Wine Advocate for many years and is in very high demand. If ever there was a wine that deserved such a price, this is it. So I started looking over my own notes on past vintages. They were good, but not stellar. I pulled a 2003 out of my cellar to do a little liquid research. Even after a few hours in the decanter, the 2003 was disjointed and a confusion of flavors and structure. All the elements were there, but it was too young. I recorked and waited a day. Day two it was much, much better. It made me feel confident that in 3-4 years, this would be a great bottle of wine, but right now, our own 2003 Match Butterdragon Hill is a better wine and a more enjoyable experience.
So what to do? If I go ahead and pay the $125 for this offer, I’ll be buying wine that probably won’t be worth the money to me until 2017 or later. How many special occasions do I celebrate each year that are worthy of such an expenditure? And this won’t be the only time I am tempted this year by a wine this — or even more — expensive. If I wait long enough, the decision will be made for me. They’ll sell out. Already the mags are gone. But each day I suffer from those symptoms I described, distracted by the temptation — or is it a fixation — to order.
I know other wine collectors face similar dilemmas this month. How are you deciding?